THE TYPES OF FLOUTING MAXIM BY GOVERNOR CANDIDATES OF NORTH SUMATERA IN ELECTION DEBATE 2018
TRI WITA INDAH SARI, ZAINUDDIN, AMRIN SARAGIH
PASCASARJANA UNIMED
Abstract
Debate is a method of interactive argument by speakers and listeners should be ensure the meaning from communication can be delivered properly. It means that they must have a goood intentionally to be shared information by one speakers with another. The phenomena when people do not follow the rules of cooperative principle is called flouting maxim. People will be missunderstanding in conversation while the utterences of people is difficult to be understood. By implying meaning from people can not be accepted by listeners and can be the problem in flouting maxim. In this research the objective of this study is to find out the types of flouting maxim by candidates governor of North Sumatera in election debate 2018. This study will use the types of flouting maxim proposed by Joan Cutting, Such as flouting maxim of quantity, flouting maxim of quality, flouting maxim of manner and flouting maxim of relevance. The source of the data of this study will be gathered by youtube channel and the data will be sentences and phrase that contains of flouting maxim. This study will apply descriptive qualitative.
Keywords: PRAGMATICS, FLOUTING MAXIM, POLITICAL DEBATE
Topic: Social,Language and Cultural Education