A COMPARISON BETWEEN INDONESIAN AND THE UNITED KINGDOM LAW IN THE CONTEXT OF ERRADICATING THE CORRUPTION BY THE STATE COMPANY
Diastama Anggita Ramadhan, S.H., L.LM. (a*) ; Zil Aidi, S.H., M.H. (b)

a) Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang
Jalan Prof. Soedharto No. 1, Tembalang, Semarang, Jawa Tengah, 50275 Indonesia
*RamadhanD[at]live.undip.ac.id

b)Faculty of Law, Univeristas Diponegoro, Semarang
Jalan Prof. Soedharto No.1, Tembalang, Semarang, Jawa Tengah, 50275 Indonesia

Abstract

The government of Indonesia has finally decided that the state company could become the suspect of the corruption case. The Corruption Erradication Commission state that the law did not made a specific difference between the corruption conducted by a person or corruption which conducted by the state company. The Supreme Court of Indonesia has also confirmed the commission statement by creating the Supreme Court Official Regulation (PERMA) Number 13/2016. This article will use the normative legal research. It will also do a comparison with the United Kingdom who already implemented the law. Despite the differences of the legal system between two countries, both countries have similar law, hence both county could shared their experience.

Keywords: Corruption, Erradication, State Company.

Topic: ASIAN Conference on Comparative Laws

Link: https://ifory.id/abstract-plain/wP9zGBb4ZTke

Web Format | Corresponding Author (Diastama Anggita Ramadhan)