CORRUPTION PERCEPTION INDEX AND LOCALLY GENERATED REVENUE: HAVE THEY GOTTEN BETTER OR WORSE? CASE STUDY IN 10 MAJOR CITIES IN INDONESIA Rofikoh Rokhim, Ruri Eka Fauziah Nasution, Asiah Muchtar, Wahyudi Thohary
Rofikoh Rokhim Universitas Indonesia
Ruri Eka Fauziah Nasution Durham University
Asiah Muchtar Sciences Po
Wahyudi Thohary Transparancy International
Abstract
One possible indicator for measuring the local governments- corruption eradication performance in Indonesia is the Corruption Perception Index (CPI) published by the Transparency International Indonesia (TII). This paper attempts to provide an overview of CPI scoring trends for 10 cities (Medan, Padang, Bandung, Semarang, Surabaya, Banjarmasin, Pontianak, Makassar, and Manado). Two different periods are assessed in this research: 2004-2010 and 2014-2016. By using a descriptive analysis approach, this research finds that Banjarmasin, Padang, and Manado are the top three cities with the highest average CPI scores in 2004-2010. Meanwhile, Pekanbaru, Pontianak, and Manado are the three lowest-scoring cities. In 2014-2016, several cities such as Surabaya and Pontianak have a significant increase in their CPI scores, placing Banjarmasin, Surabaya, and Pontianak in the top three. On the other hand, the average CPI scores of several cities such as Padang, Makassar, and Manado significantly decline. In addition, this research also maps the central allocation funds for local governments and the Locally-Generated Revenues (PAD) against the levels of corruption. As a matter of fact, the regions with the smallest allocations tend to have higher CPI scores. Further, the regions with higher CPI scores also have higher Locally-Generated Revenues. However, these findings lack empirical evidence due to limited data.
Keywords: Corruption, decentralization, Corruption Perception Index (CPI).
If your conference is listed in our system, please put our logo somewhere in your website.
Simply copy-paste the HTML code below to your website (ask your web admin):